National Service
has always been a highly contentious matter in Australia, particularly during
the Vietnam War era when 20-year old conscripts were required to become combat
soldiers in a real “shooting war”.
Ultimately some
63,000 young men were called up between 1965 and 1972 and 15,380 served in
Vietnam. 184 National Servicemen died there and 880 were wounded in action.
Australian troops arrive at Saigon Airport
during the Vietnam War - Wikipedia image
Towards the end
of the war the opposition to sending conscripts to Vietnam had become very
strong, with several large public demonstrations taking place in capital cities
and organisations such as the “Save our Sons” group gaining considerable
support.
The war had become generally unpopular by 1972, to such an
extent that the then leader of the Opposition, Gough Whitlam, made the ending
of conscription one of his key election issues. It certainly did play a
significant part in producing a change of Government, and primarily for this
reason successive political parties have steadfastly avoided any plans for the
reintroduction of National Service.
The Hon. Gough Whitlam, 21st Prime Minister of Australia
(Wikipedia image)
But perhaps it was not National Service, as
such, that was the basic problem, but more the way it was implemented. The
selection system, involving the drawing of a marble from a Tattersall’s lottery
barrel, provided a date and all 20 year old men whose birthday fell on that
date were called up. The Leader of
the Opposition in 1965, Arthur Calwell, described this system as the ‘lottery
of death’.
Then there was the fact that conscripts were sent into a
war zone. It’s bad enough when an Australian soldier is killed in an overseas
war, but when a National Serviceman is killed in action, the situation becomes
political dynamite.
But National Service does not have to be like this. There
are ways of instituting a system that avoids these highly contentious issues
and is still of considerable benefit to both the individual and to the nation.
Various schemes have been suggested over the years and here
is one of these.
A call up for all twenty year olds is instituted – men and
women – with the requirement for a three - month period of service. The
inductee would have a choice of various electives and these could be chosen
from the following areas:
The Army – a basic training course
Community work – Meals on Wheels, shopping and gardening
for the elderly, work in nursing homes, Salvation Army, Vincent de Paul.
Council work – bushland regeneration
State Emergency Services (SES)
Rural Fire Services (RFS)
If Australia is involved in armed conflict at the time
there would be no requirement for the conscript to become involved unless he or
she volunteered and this would require leaving the National Service scheme and
joining the regular Army.
“Points” could be attached to these activities depending on
Government priorities, and
after a certain number was amassed, the conscript would be
entitled to a subsidised home loan.
The SES in Victoria attend a vehicle accident
(Wikipedia image)
Such a scheme would be of considerable benefit to the
nation. We would develop a large number of young people with basic military
training that could be of great assistance in the event of mobilisation. Work
in the SES and Rural Fire Services would improve our responses in emergency
civil situations.
A considerable amount of useful community work would be
undertaken – work which is presently in “on hold” because of the lack of people
power.
And finally, such work would be of great benefit to the
individual. Apart from the character building and discipline that comes from
involvement in work of this type, unique networking opportunities arise from
the mix of people that comes with National Service.
Would it work?
Ask not what
your country can do for you – ask what you can do for your country - President
John F. Kennedy, January 20th 1961.